The hearings highlight the delicate task of endorsing past rulings.

Beyond a few established cases, nominees often say they cannot comment on whether precedents were correctly decided. And they seem to have grown more cautious about where they draw the line.

ADAM LIPTAK
Author: ADAM LIPTAK

Advertisements
{ "slotId": "6845006044", "unitType": "responsive", "resize": "auto" }

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.