Depositions from the bank’s chief executive, Jamie Dimon, and another top executive paint a picture of leaders who rarely communicated about Mr. Epstein.
A proposed court settlement closes another chapter in the German bank’s relationship with the disgraced financier, which began in 2013 and continued up until late 2018.
Two criminal defendants have asked the Supreme Court to decide whether remote testimony against them violated the Sixth Amendment’s confrontation clause.
The Supreme Court has been asked to review the practice, which a judge called “a stew of confusion and hypocrisy” and which challengers say violates the First Amendment.
The Supreme Court has been asked to review the practice, which a judge called “a stew of confusion and hypocrisy” and which challengers say violates the First Amendment.