JESSE WEGMAN

A New York judge said his lies “shock the conscience.”

The president performed a public service by forthrightly stating what could happen to the country and its democracy if Trump wins again.

The state’s Supreme Court recognized that some decisions, including whether a president engaged in insurrection, cannot be left to voters.

American voters deserve to know before the election whether Trump is a convicted criminal. The Supreme Court has the power to make that happen.

Justice O’Connor devoted her life after the court to fighting for an independent judiciary free of politics.

For many in Vermont, the horror of a shooting of Palestinians was compounded by the violation of the state’s self-image as a uniquely welcoming place.

The Supreme Court’s new ethics code lacks any teeth and is full of language too fuzzy to hold justices accountable. And its tone is resentful.

As a principle of academic debate, speech should be presumptively allowed. The details of achieving that may get messy, but that goal is fundamental.

Being in a courtroom deprives Trump of his superpower: his ability to speak without consequence, without factual basis, and often without end.

Fifty years after Watergate, a president again used lawyers to abuse his office. Those lawyers now face prosecution, and tarnished their profession.